Well i have been trying to raise awarness and get people enthusiastic, my first attempt about a year ago now had some sucess, i introduced blogging and got 3 staff members blogging their teaching. Now i know this is not a wiki but it was a result. The wrong one but a result.
So this year i am having another go, from a different angle. the brief was for a web site full of text and links to act as a guide for students on how to run an event. web sites are ok but….and this is often a big but, they are very difficult to maintain and keep fresh, but i created 3 pages then got the Uni to load up some wiki software and authored the same 3 pages as an alternative.
Now i prefered the wiki, the site looked great, but the never ending updates to what was to be an emerging project would fall to me, and that is not good. Webmasters were great when we only had web pages, but these days the web is far more flxible, and communication and information processing should notbe the domain of the few.
So i got the wiki, and it was good, staff could add, edit, and be creative as they wish, and the whole package could become far more organic. My whole pitch to them was the Monoluge and Dialouge metaphore and communication, the wiki in its first incarnation would use the idea of a monolouge metaphore on the subject, and once they felt comfortable with it all, we would use the idea of a dialouge metaphore, where students could add and create entries, and staff could be the guardian editors. Not realy a dialouge, but i am working on the phrasiology.
One of the first problem i have is to help staff to understand the web (spiders web) nature of the information on a wiki, it is not linier and setm as in a web site. the information contained in the wiki grows, and is at times almost organic in structure growing in direction as well as amount of content.
Looking around the web sites like Psychology Wiki have opted for the metaphore of a book and though it is easily navigated it still trys to replicate traditional communication methods like books. The Maths Wiki
Is also actualy fairly traditional in its approach listing content by Educational level and then by Concentration, the first catogary being easiliy understoodthe second being a little more prosaic and unintelible.
What i would like to continue exploring is the idea of the wiki as a monoluge or dialouge, a conversation about or perhapse better in a subject. Where the basics are laid out as a monoulouge but the unpacking and understanding and linkigaes within the subject are defined and redefined over time in an information dialouge between student and teacher.
i use the word teacher rather than lecture because in the sence of social learning, all that is traditional about a subject becomes only the starting point not the end of the journey (if that can ever be reached) the organic nature of linkes in pages using single words or short phrases to define and redefine or perhaps better to refine the understanding of the subject.
Not finished here but it is enough to start, pelease comment.